Reduce Costs

Want to up your influence?

Reduce Costs

is included with 56 Influence Tactics

INFLUENCE TACTICS

32

 

Reduce Costs

Reduce what people need to invest to encourage action.

 
 

What is it:

Every time we decide to do something, it costs us—whether it’s in time, effort, missed chances, or even mental strain. These costs influence our decisions, often leading us to choose one action over another. Over time, if the costs are too high, they can stop us from doing things altogether. By understanding and reducing these costs, we can make it easier for people to take action and prevent these barriers from arising.

 

When to use it best:

 

How to use it:





 

What’s the science behind it?

  • Prospect Theory is a foundational concept in behavioural economics developed by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, which describes how people make decisions involving risk. Central to this theory is the idea that losses loom larger than gains; in other words, the pain of losing is psychologically more impactful than the pleasure of gaining something of equivalent value. This theory also highlights that people evaluate potential losses and gains not in absolute terms, but from a reference point, which could be their current state or their expectations.
    Reduce Costs tactic is effective because it aligns with the principles of Prospect Theory by minimising the perceived losses (costs) associated with an action. By lowering the investment required—whether it's time, effort, or resources—this approach reduces the psychological burden or 'loss' felt by an individual when contemplating a new or different behavior. This makes the action more appealing as the balance shifts towards gains rather than losses. Essentially, by reducing the costs, the tactic lessens the pain associated with the effort, making people more likely to act because the perceived risk of loss is diminished.

  • A cognitive bias that explains people's preference for the current state of affairs, where any change from this baseline is perceived as a loss. The theory suggests that individuals are more likely to stick with known quantities rather than opting for an alternative, due to the perceived risks and efforts associated with change. This resistance can be seen in various contexts, from everyday choices to significant life decisions, where the fear of loss or the effort required for change outweighs potential benefits.

 

32

 

Want more influence?
Dig into an unlocked tactic:

 
 
Lauren Alys Kelly

Lauren Alys Kelly is the founder of Alterkind, overseeing the behavioural design, tool development, training and research. They publish tools like BehaviourKit.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/laurenalyskelly/
Previous
Previous

Ready-Set Plans

Next
Next

Collaborative Feedback